Conflicts in the workplace are a natural phenomenon and occur even in the most well-functioning teams. One of the most complex types of organizational conflicts is value conflict, which arises from fundamental differences in beliefs, priorities, and principles held by team members and organizations.
Nature and Definition of Value Conflict
A value conflict occurs when individuals or groups hold differing beliefs or values that clash, affecting their interactions and decisions. These conflicts are particularly complex because they touch upon the core of what we consider most important, often involving moral, ethical, or personal preferences that define our identity.
Conflicts arise where there is a contradiction between beliefs, actions, or their assessment. A true value conflict occurs when an individual experiences internal dilemmas and struggles with choosing the right values to uphold. The most difficult, and often irresolvable, conflict is between two perceived “good” values.
In scientific literature, conflict is recognized as a “difficult situation,” “antagonistic cooperation,” or “social antagonism.” The tendency to engage in conflicts is not solely a cultural construct but also has a biological basis. Modern researchers acknowledge that conflict is natural, beneficial, and necessary, and most conflicts are based on real differences. When managed properly, conflict can stimulate innovative thinking.
Types and Sources of Value Conflicts in Organizations
Research identifies several key types of conflicts in organizations. Task-related conflicts are impersonal and concern specific issues, arising from differences in opinions and being relatively easy to resolve. Emotional conflicts, on the other hand, stem from personal factors, such as negative emotions and attitudes toward others, which impact the work environment.
From an organizational perspective, value conflicts often arise from:
- Conflicting goals – Different departments within a company have distinct objectives that may contradict one another. For example, the marketing department aims to maximize sales by offering a wide range of products, while the production department focuses on cost minimization through long production series.
- Competition for resources – Limited resources can lead to conflicts between departments vying for increased funding or prioritization.
- Profanation as a source of conflict – This refers to actions perceived as violating sacred values, norms, or ideas. In a broader sense, profanation includes any actions that undermine what is considered intrinsically valuable.
Impact of Value Conflicts on Teams and Organizations
Conflict in a team can either create value or destroy it. A well-managed conflict fosters respectful debate and leads to mutually agreed-upon solutions that are often superior to initially proposed ideas. However, unresolved conflicts can hinder productivity and stifle innovation.
Studies show that both task-related and relational conflicts negatively affect team satisfaction, performance, trust, commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. According to Harvard Business Review, differences in opinion are not inherently problematic. Most destructive conflicts stem from deeper issues, such as perceived incompatibility in how different team members operate, influenced by factors like personality, industry, race, gender, and age.
Research involving 306 team members across 76 teams in 18 organizations found that perceived task and relational conflicts in a team were positively correlated with individual perceptions of psychological contract violations.
A case study involving Rubrik vs. Gartner demonstrated how value conflicts can impact business relationships and the perception of objectivity. Rubrik challenged the credibility of Gartner’s Magic Quadrant report, arguing that the research methodology was flawed and exhibited bias.
Further research from Gartner found that 40% of projected value from business initiatives is never realized due to poor data quality, leading to conflicts between departments responsible for data management.
Strategies for Managing Value Conflicts
Numerous strategies for addressing value conflicts in public management have been proposed in academic literature, including:
- Cycling – Continuously revisiting and reevaluating conflicts.
- Firewalling – Isolating conflicts to prevent escalation.
- Casuistry – Resolving conflicts on a case-by-case basis.
- Incrementalism – Implementing gradual changes to address conflicts over time.
Thatcher and Rein propose an alternative to instrumental rationality-based management, advocating for practical reasoning that acknowledges value pluralism and incommensurability. Their approach emphasizes situational judgment and contextual appropriateness.
MIT Sloan research highlights the importance of innovation, leadership, community, and collaboration as key values for managing conflicts. The institution fosters an environment where diverse individuals can engage in dialogue and build long-term connections, promoting a spirit of cooperation crucial in resolving value conflicts.
In psychotherapy, Heilman and Witzum suggest a value-sensitive approach, recognizing that significant value conflicts can shape the course of therapy. Ethical guidelines alone do not provide sufficient direction for negotiating delicate issues related to value conflicts.
Ricoeur argues that the motivation for compromise lies in the idea of the common good. Compromise can lead to an approximation of shared principles, bridging disagreements.
Before rejecting a concession on a matter deemed sacred, individuals should consider whether an outcome that honors the spirit of their values—while allowing for flexibility in details—is possible. Similarly, if the opposing party insists on the sanctity of an issue, proposing a solution that respects their values while finding common ground can be effective.
Empirical Research on Value Conflicts
Studies involving 70 new product development teams found that task conflicts involving key team members (those central to workflow networks) positively influenced team creativity through increased reflexivity. This positive effect was amplified by shared team goals. Conversely, relational conflicts involving key members negatively affected creativity by reducing team cohesion, though emotional intelligence mitigated this effect.
A case study on the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Denmark in 2014 revealed that organizations with explicit, openly acknowledged value conflicts can achieve better outcomes through cooperation. Water councils, consisting of environmental advocates and water resource users, were formed to collaboratively develop solutions for implementing the directive. These findings challenge the assumption that inter-organizational cooperation is beneficial only when based on shared values.
Research involving 306 team members across 76 teams in 18 organizations confirmed that perceived task and relational conflicts within a team correlated with individual perceptions of psychological contract violations.
Conclusions
Value conflicts in teams and organizations are natural and inevitable. While they can reduce performance and satisfaction, when managed effectively, they can also drive innovation and lead to better solutions. Recognizing their existence, understanding their sources, and applying appropriate management strategies are crucial for handling them effectively.
Studies suggest that strategies based on practical reasoning, value sensitivity, and a focus on the common good can help resolve value conflicts. Additionally, cooperation between organizations with differing values can yield positive results if the right conditions for dialogue and consensus-building exist.
Future research should explore further strategies for managing value conflicts and examine their effects on organizational innovation, performance, and employee satisfaction. Particular attention should be given to value conflicts in increasingly diverse workplaces and globalized environments, which may amplify both the frequency and intensity of such conflicts.
Empatyzer – The Ideal Solution for the Discussed Problem
Pillar 1: AI Chat as an Intelligent 24/7 Coach
Pillar 2: Micro-Lessons Tailored to the User
Pillar 3: Professional Personality and Cultural Preference Diagnosis
Empatyzer – Ease of Implementation and Immediate Results
Why is “Empatyzer” Unique?
Learn more about management training.
Find more details about the communication online course.
