In today’s diverse work environment, where people with different experiences, beliefs, and priorities come together, value conflicts have become an inevitable part of organizational dynamics. These conflicts, deeply rooted in employees’ beliefs and identities, pose some of the most complex challenges for modern leaders and managers. This article presents the current state of knowledge on value conflicts in organizations, drawing on Christopher Moore’s Circle of Conflict and the latest research from reputable academic sources.
Values in Organizations – Diversity and Complexity
Values play a fundamental role in shaping employee behavior and influencing decision-making. As noted by Beck Jørgensen and Bozeman (2007) in their comprehensive review, up to 72 different public values can be identified within organizations. While this diversity enriches an organization’s perspective, it inevitably leads to situations where different values come into conflict.
According to Rutgers and Steen (2016), values serve as internal standards of judgment and action guidelines, although there is not always a direct causal link between values and behavior. These values can include loyalty, communication approaches, feedback styles, precision, and goal-setting strategies—everything that motivates us to perform work in a particular way.
Moore’s Circle of Conflict – A Model for Understanding Tensions
Christopher Moore, a recognized expert in mediation and negotiation, developed the “Circle of Conflict” model, which categorizes conflicts based on their sources. This model is a valuable tool for understanding and resolving conflicts in the workplace.
Moore’s Circle of Conflict identifies five primary sources of conflicts:
- Relationship Conflicts – Stemming from interpersonal differences, miscommunication, strong emotions, lack of trust, or differences in interaction styles.
- Data Conflicts – Arising from missing information, misinformation, different perspectives on data relevance, or differing interpretations of facts.
- Interest Conflicts – Based on competing or conflicting interests, decision-making procedures, or negotiations, including psychological interests such as status, power, identity, and autonomy.
- Value Conflicts – Emerging from differing worldviews or criteria for evaluating ideas, as well as perceived lack of respect or violation of personally held values.
- Structural Conflicts – Related to unequal distribution of power, authority, influence, resource control, or time constraints.
Value Conflicts – The Most Complex Challenge
Among all types of conflicts, value conflicts are often the hardest to resolve because they touch on fundamental aspects of employees’ identities and beliefs. As highlighted by research published by the Harvard Program on Negotiation, “Value conflicts can arise from fundamental differences in identities and values, encompassing differences in beliefs, lifestyle, or ethics.”
Research by De Dreu and Weingart (2003) found that value conflicts have a strong negative impact on team performance and member satisfaction. Additionally, Jehn (1997) confirmed that value conflicts significantly deteriorate key performance indicators such as team cohesion and productivity.
Polish academic studies indicate that employee motivation can drop by 20-50% in the presence of conflicts. Teams experiencing internal conflicts show a 5% decrease in efficiency in practical tasks and up to a 40% decrease in performance on complex problem-solving tasks.
The Psychological Dimension of Value Conflicts
When our values are ignored or challenged, we experience a sense of threat, adopt a defensive stance, and lose emotional balance. As Christopher Moore points out, value conflicts are difficult to resolve because they challenge deeply held beliefs and worldviews, which are central to our identity.
Constantly adapting to the work style of someone with differing values can be emotionally exhausting. A report published by Insights notes, “Constantly adjusting to others’ work styles with little empathy from them does not foster effective teamwork.”
Impact on Organizations and Work Environment
According to a special edition of MIT Sloan Management Review dedicated to workplace values, value conflicts can significantly affect several key aspects of organizational functioning, including:
- Achieving the organization’s shared mission
- Psychological safety of employees
- Progress in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives
- Ethical behavior and organizational culture
Research by Amason and Sapienza (1997) also indicates that unresolved conflicts often lead to decreased trust within teams and weakened collaboration. On an organizational scale, a report by the American Management Association (AMA) found that managers spend at least 24% of their workday (approximately 2 hours in an 8-hour workday) dealing with workplace conflicts.
Strategies for Resolving Value Conflicts
Resolving value conflicts requires a unique approach that acknowledges the deep, identity-based nature of these tensions. Based on scientific research and practical experience, several effective strategies can be identified:
- Identifying the Core Value Causing the Conflict – As Christopher Moore suggests, resolving value conflicts often begins with identifying and naming the core value in dispute and understanding its significance to those involved.
- Acceptance of Differences – According to the Annie E. Casey Foundation, adopting a mindset that accepts differences in values while focusing on areas of agreement can help overcome impasses.
- Understanding the Experiences That Shaped Values – Studies suggest that discussing the experiences that shaped each person’s values can foster mutual understanding and empathy.
- Creating a Culture of Psychological Safety – As research by Amy C. Edmondson, cited in MIT Sloan Management Review, indicates, an environment where employees feel safe expressing their opinions and concerns facilitates constructive resolution of value conflicts.
- Mediation by a Neutral Third Party – In cases of deep value conflicts, involving a neutral mediator can help facilitate difficult conversations and identify compromise solutions.
Conclusions and Recommendations for Leaders
Although value conflicts are challenging to resolve, they can also serve as opportunities for deeper discussions and better understanding of diverse perspectives, potentially leading to innovative solutions and organizational growth. Researchers from Wrocław University of Economics highlight that aligning personal and organizational values is critical for employees’ success, particularly during their first year of employment.
For leaders and managers, developing skills to identify conflict sources and apply appropriate resolution techniques is essential. According to Gartner’s “9 Future of Work Trends 2024” report, resolving workplace conflicts is becoming a top priority for organizations facing increasing workforce diversity and challenges related to hybrid work.
As one of the most challenging aspects of team management, value conflicts require leaders to possess not only technical skills but also empathy, understanding, and respect for diverse beliefs and worldviews. Utilizing Moore’s Circle of Conflict can be a practical tool for managers seeking to understand and effectively address these complex situations, contributing to a more harmonious and productive work environment.
Empatyzer – The Ideal Solution for Conflict Management
Pillar 1: AI Chat Coach Available 24/7
Empatyzer AI understands the personality, character traits, preferences, and organizational context of users and their teams. It provides hyper-personalized advice, tailored to both the individual and the realities of their team. Recommendations are given in real-time, helping managers resolve conflicts immediately rather than waiting for training.
Pillar 2: Micro-Lessons Tailored to the User
Twice a week, users receive short, three-minute micro-lessons via email. These lessons are personalized—either focusing on the manager’s strengths and weaknesses or improving communication within the team. Practical insights include real-world scenarios, ready-to-use techniques, and specific phrases applicable to different situations.
Pillar 3: Professional Personality and Cultural Preference Assessment
Empatyzer analyzes the user’s personality, strengths, weaknesses, and unique characteristics within the team, company, and broader population. It helps leaders understand their role in the organization, identify hidden talents, and determine the best leadership style.
Learn more about leadership training for managers: leadership training for managers .
Explore communication training online: communication training online .
