In today’s dynamic business environment, leadership is universally recognized as a key factor for an organization’s success. However, not all leadership contributes to positive outcomes. Increasing attention is being paid to negative leadership styles, particularly toxic leadership, which can pose a serious threat to the organization and its employees. Toxic leadership, although not always immediately visible, can gradually destroy morale, reduce productivity, and negatively affect the overall work climate. In the face of such threats, building organizational resilience becomes a crucial element of strategy for any company striving for long-term success and the well-being of its employees. This article aims to deeply examine the definition, impact, and strategies for building organizational resilience against toxic leadership behaviors, based on international research and best practices.
Defining Toxic Leadership in Light of Research
The concept of toxic leadership, despite its common use in business and psychological discourse, does not have a universally accepted definition. The complexity of this phenomenon makes its clear definition a challenge. One of the early definitions was proposed by Marcia Lynn Whicker in 1996, focusing on harmful behaviors of leaders that personally attack and hurt employees. Karen Wilson-Starks, on the other hand, described toxic leadership as an approach that harms people and ultimately the company by poisoning enthusiasm, creativity, autonomy, and innovative expression through excessive control.
Jean Lipman-Blumen defines toxic leadership as a process in which leaders, through their destructive behaviors or dysfunctional personality traits, cause serious and lasting damage to their subordinates, organizations, and external individuals. Interestingly, Lipman-Blumen also notes that the definition of a toxic leader can be subjective, dependent on context, history, and perspective. In the military environment, the US Army defines a toxic leader as a “toxic, egocentric abuser,” often intelligent and energetic, goal-oriented, but arrogant, abusive, impulsive, and distrustful.
Synthesizing these various perspectives, it can be concluded that toxic leadership is characterized by a pattern of harmful behaviors in which leaders prioritize their personal goals and benefits over the interests of the team and the organization. These behaviors often include intimidation, manipulation, a lack of concern for the well-being of subordinates, a negative impact on organizational climate, and a leader motivated primarily by their own interests. Specific traits of toxic leadership may include presenting harmful goals as noble visions, dividing team members, and isolating employees.
Barbara Kellerman identifies seven types of “bad” leadership, including incompetent, rigid, immoderate, callous, corrupt, isolated, and evil leadership. Meanwhile, Ashforth describes “petty tyranny,” characterized by arbitrariness, demeaning subordinates, lack of consideration, forcing conflict resolution, discouraging initiative, and inconsistent punishment. Perspectives from the Spanish language add definitions such as “unbearable and harmful to mental and physical health” (Cubeiro and Gallardo) and leaders characterized by autocracy, narcissism, manipulation, intimidation, extreme competition, and discrimination (“Leadership Forces”). The French perspective highlights a lack of concern for subordinates, negative impact on climate, and motivation driven by personal interests (Guay), as well as leadership arising from unfulfilled needs, leading to manipulation, divisions, and fear.
The evolution of the definition of toxic leadership from an early focus on direct harm to employees to a broader understanding of the impact on the organization and specific behaviors reflects a deeper understanding of this phenomenon. Despite the lack of a single universal definition, consistent elements such as egocentrism, harmful behaviors, and negative impact on the work environment form the foundation for understanding toxic leadership. The subjectivity in defining this phenomenon emphasizes the importance of context and individual experiences in recognizing and labeling such behaviors, suggesting that culture and organizational norms play a significant role in shaping perceptions of acceptable leadership. Differences in types of toxic leaders (e.g., passive vs. active, narcissistic, micromanagers) suggest that effective countermeasures against toxic leadership may require different approaches.
Negative Consequences of Toxic Leadership for Organizations and Employees
The negative consequences of toxic leadership are extensive and affect both employees and the entire organization. Employees experience reduced morale and engagement, feeling fear, resentment, underappreciation, and psychological stress. A lack of recognition and limited career development opportunities further contribute to the decline in morale. Psychological stress manifests as anxiety, burnout, depression, low self-esteem, and emotional exhaustion. Long-term exposure to toxic leadership can lead to physical health issues as well as increased absenteeism and illness. The “trickle-down effect” phenomenon means that the toxic behaviors of leaders lead to a lack of courtesy and respect among team members.
The organization incurs significant costs associated with toxic leadership, such as increased employee turnover, reduced productivity and efficiency, diminished loyalty and engagement, and communication problems. Furthermore, the organization’s reputation may be damaged, and the risk of legal issues and regulatory compliance may rise.
Research from reputable sources provides further evidence of the negative impact of toxic leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review showed that a toxic corporate culture is the strongest predictor of employee turnover, ten times more important than salary. The Journal of Business and Psychology indicates that toxic leadership leads to employee dissatisfaction, low morale, decreased productivity, higher stress levels, worse job satisfaction, and reduced trust. Research published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior shows that toxic leadership positively influences counterproductive work behaviors, organizational cynicism, and injustice, destroying trust and reducing engagement. Harvard Business Review reports lower financial performance for companies with poor leadership. Spanish studies emphasize the impact on the work environment, motivation, creativity, equality, stress, anxiety, and potential legal consequences. French perspectives draw attention to creating a climate of fear, disappointment, demotivation, and an increased risk of burnout and job boredom.
The financial consequences of toxic leadership extend beyond the loss of productivity and include increased costs related to employee turnover, absenteeism, legal fees, and damaged reputation, making it a compelling business case for addressing this issue. The consistency of negative effects across different cultural contexts (English, French, Spanish research) suggests that toxic leadership is a universal problem with similar harmful effects on employees and organizations worldwide. The impact of toxic leadership on employee well-being can have long-term consequences, potentially leading to chronic health problems and affecting their lives outside the workplace.
What is Organizational Resilience and Why is it Crucial in the Fight Against Toxic Leadership?
Organizational resilience is defined as the ability of a business or company to adapt – whether in response to a historical event or changing trends in leadership or management. Standard BS 65000 defines organizational resilience as “the ability of an organization to anticipate, prepare, respond, and adapt to gradual changes and sudden disruptions in order to survive and thrive.” David Denyer from Cranfield University defines it as the ability of an organization to anticipate, prepare, respond, and adapt to gradual changes and sudden disruptions in order to survive and thrive. The British Guidance on organizational resilience (BS 65000:2014) defines it as “the ability of an organization to anticipate, prepare, respond, and adapt to gradual changes and sudden disruptions in order to survive and thrive.” ISO 22316:2017 defines it as “the ability of an organization to absorb and adapt in a changing environment.”
A resilient organization not only survives a crisis but also learns from mistakes and potentially becomes stronger. Key characteristics of a resilient organization include the ability to adapt and flexibility, robustness, strategic agility, strong organizational culture, effective communication, and solid management.
Organizational resilience is crucial in the context of toxic leadership because it equips the organization with the tools to:
- Mitigate negative impacts: A resilient organization is better prepared to absorb shocks and stresses caused by toxic leaders, minimizing harm to employee well-being and organizational outcomes.
- Effectively return to balance: When toxic behaviors occur, a resilient organization has systems and processes in place to quickly address the issues and support affected employees.
- Prevent future occurrences: By building a culture of resilience, organizations can create an environment where toxic behaviors are less likely to occur.
- Promote a healthy culture: Resilience is often associated with traits such as trust, open communication, and employee support, which are the opposite of the environment created by toxic leaders.
It is important to distinguish between individual resilience (the ability of an employee to cope with stress and adversity) and organizational resilience (the collective ability of the organization to withstand and adapt), although they are interconnected and function at different levels.
Many definitions of organizational resilience emphasize proactivity, suggesting that building resilience is not just about responding to problems but also anticipating potential threats, including toxic leadership, and taking preventive actions. The classification of organizational resilience levels (Fragile, Robust, Resilient, Antifragile) provides useful frameworks for organizations to assess their current state and identify areas that need improvement in their ability to withstand various types of changes and disruptions, including those caused by toxic leadership. Identifying specific factors contributing to organizational resilience (e.g., Business Continuity, Financial Condition, Human Resource Management) provides a practical action plan for organizations seeking to build resilience against various threats, including toxic leadership, by focusing on strengthening these key areas.
Strategies for Building an Organization Resistant to Toxic Leadership Behaviors
Building an organization resistant to toxic leadership behaviors requires a multifaceted approach, including both identifying and eliminating toxic leaders and creating a supportive environment that can withstand negative influences. Key strategies include:
- Leader Development and Accountability:
- Implement comprehensive leadership training programs that emphasize ethical leadership, emotional intelligence, empathy, and integrative practices.
- Set clear expectations for leader behaviors, include them in job descriptions and performance evaluations.
- Implement 360-degree feedback mechanisms to provide leaders with anonymous feedback from subordinates, peers, and superiors.
- Hold leaders accountable for toxic behaviors through clear rules, disciplinary actions, and, in extreme cases, removal from positions.
- Promote self-awareness and mindfulness among leaders to help them understand the impact of their actions.
- Supporting a Positive and Ethical Organizational Culture:
- Define and communicate clear organizational values that promote respect, trust, psychological safety, and well-being.
- Create a culture of open and transparent communication where employees feel safe expressing concerns without fear of retaliation.
- Implement zero-tolerance policies for offensive and unethical behaviors.
- Promote mentorship programs and peer support to create a supportive environment.
- Acknowledge and reward employees demonstrating positive behaviors aligned with organizational values.
- Ensure integration of ethical considerations in daily operations.
- Create a pleasant work environment to boost morale.
- Establishing Solid Reporting Mechanisms and Intervention Strategies:
- Implement confidential and anonymous channels for reporting toxic behaviors.
- Develop clear procedures for investigating and addressing complaints about toxic leadership.
- Ensure access to HR specialists and conflict management resources for mediation and problem-solving.
- Offer coaching and support to both employees experiencing toxic leadership and leaders exhibiting such behaviors.
- Consider using external assessments to gain an objective view of organizational culture and leadership.
- Prioritizing Employee Well-Being and Resilience:
- Implement employee well-being programs that address stress management, mental health, and work-life balance.
- Encourage employees to set clear boundaries between work and personal life.
- Develop resilience skills in employees through training and resources.
- Foster a sense of community and connection among employees.
- Acknowledge and respond to the emotional impact of toxic leadership.
- Continuous Monitoring and Improvement:
- Regularly conduct employee engagement surveys and feedback sessions to monitor organizational climate and identify potential issues.
- Track employee turnover rates and reasons for departures to identify patterns linked to leadership.
- Regularly assess the effectiveness of implemented strategies and make necessary adjustments.
Effective counteraction against toxic leadership requires a systemic and multifaceted approach, involving interventions at many levels of the organization, not just relying on isolated initiatives. Strengthening employee empowerment, enabling them to have a voice, and providing safe channels for this purpose are key to identifying and addressing toxic leadership. A culture of silence may facilitate the persistence of toxic behaviors without control. A comprehensive approach includes both preventing toxic behaviors (e.g., leadership development, culture change) and mitigating their effects when they occur (e.g., reporting mechanisms, employee support).
Examples from Life: Organizations Facing Toxic Leadership
Examples from life indicate that toxic leadership is common across various industries and types of organizations, from the military to retail and technology. Companies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Uber have been cited as examples of moral crises resulting from toxic leadership, showing the potential harm to reputation and finances that organizations may face. On the other hand, Starbucks is an example of resilient leadership in action during the pandemic, demonstrating adaptability and prioritizing employee well-being. Analyzing their strategy for returning to balance can provide valuable lessons.
Studies in the retail industry during the COVID-19 pandemic provide a case study of building organizational resilience, focusing on adaptation and innovation in the face of crisis. Research conducted in organizations in Portugal and Angola analyzed the impact of toxic leadership on employee turnover and burnout, revealing differences in the strength of these relationships in different cultural contexts. A case study on public organizations focused on employee resilience and strategies for coping with toxic leaders, analyzing various ways employees respond to negative pressure. The personal experience of a leader who underwent a transformation from toxic to servant leadership shows that awareness and engagement can lead to positive changes. Research in the US Army on the impact of toxic leadership emphasizes the need for better detection and response in the military context. A statistic indicating a high percentage of American workers experiencing a toxic work environment, with supervisors being the main issue, underscores the ubiquity of this problem.
Practical Tips for Leaders and Employees
For Leaders:
- Prioritize self-awareness and actively seek feedback on your leadership style.
- Develop emotional intelligence and empathy.
- Practice active listening and value diverse perspectives.
- Communicate clearly, transparently, and respectfully.
- Focus on empowering and developing team members, not controlling them.
- Hold yourself and other leaders accountable for ethical and respectful behavior.
- Model the values and behaviors you expect from your team.
- Be open to admitting mistakes and learning from them.
- Regularly check on team members’ well-being and be attentive to their welfare.
- Establish clear boundaries between work and personal life for yourself and encourage your team to do the same.
For Employees:
- Recognize the signs of toxic leadership (refer to the definition section).
- Set clear boundaries with toxic leaders to protect your well-being and time.
- Document specific instances of toxic behaviors, including dates, times, and details.
- Seek support from trusted colleagues, mentors, or HR specialists.
- Communicate your concerns calmly and professionally with your leader, if you feel safe doing so.
- Use available reporting mechanisms in the organization.
- Focus on maintaining work ethic and professionalism despite the negative environment.
- Develop your resilience skills through mindfulness, stress management techniques, and self-care practices.
- Consider your options, including seeking new employment if the situation becomes unbearable.
- Remember that toxic behavior does not reflect your value.
Both leaders’ and employees’ advice highlights the importance of communication, although with different emphasis – leaders need to communicate positively and be open to feedback, while employees need to effectively communicate their boundaries and concerns. Documenting toxic behaviors is recurring advice for employees, which highlights the need for objective evidence when addressing such issues, suggesting that personal relationships alone may not always be sufficient for organizational actions. Including advice for leaders to prioritize their own well-being suggests that resilience to toxic leadership is not solely about managing the behaviors of others but also about leaders taking care of their own health and effectiveness in difficult situations.
Summary and Conclusions
Toxic leadership poses a serious threat to organizations and their employees, leading to decreased morale, reduced productivity, and increased turnover. Organizational resilience is a key element in mitigating the negative effects of toxic leadership, enabling organizations to anticipate, prepare for, respond to, and adapt to challenges. Building resilience requires a multifaceted approach, including leader development, fostering a positive organizational culture, establishing solid reporting and intervention mechanisms, and prioritizing employee well-being. Examples from life show that organizations that actively build resilience are better prepared to cope with the negative effects of toxic leadership and create healthier, more productive work environments. By implementing the described strategies and practical tips, organizations can proactively build resilience and minimize the harmful impact of toxic leadership behaviors, creating an environment where employees can thrive and the organization can prosper.
Empatyzer – An Ideal Solution to the Problem
Feature 1: AI Chat as an Intelligent Coach Available 24/7
The chat understands the personality, character traits, preferences, and organizational context of the user and their team. It provides hyper-personalized advice tailored to both the inquirer and the realities of their team. Recommendations are given in real-time, helping managers solve problems here and now, instead of waiting for training.
Feature 2: Micro-Lessons Tailored to the Audience
Twice a week, users receive short, condensed micro-lessons via email that can be absorbed in three minutes. The lessons are personalized – focusing either on the manager themselves (e.g., their strengths and weaknesses and how to use them) or relationships and communication with the team. Practical tips include real-life scenarios, ready-to-use techniques, and specific phrases to use in a given situation.
Feature 3: Professional Diagnosis of Personality and Cultural Preferences
The tool analyzes the user’s personality, strengths and weaknesses, and their unique traits in the context of the team, company, and population. It enables understanding of one’s position within the organization, identifying talents, and determining the best approach.
Empatyzer – Easy Implementation and Immediate Results
Fast deployment – the tool requires no integration and can be launched in a company with 100-300 employees in less than an hour. Zero additional burden for HR – users do not generate extra questions or workload for HR, significantly saving their time. Immediate business value – the tool is designed to be quick, easy to implement, generate immediate results, and be cost-effective.
Why is “Empatyzer” Unique?
It understands not only the inquirer but also their organizational environment—delivering solutions tailored to real challenges. It is a comprehensive tool that combines coaching, education, and analysis in one, available without any effort from the user.
Learn more about online communication training – click here: online communication training .
Find out more about manager training by visiting our homepage: manager training .
