Phone triage after Naomi Musenga: tone and escalation
TL;DR: How to run an emergency call without missing life threats. Using a high-profile French case, we show concrete dispatcher and team behaviors. We focus on tone, question structure, red flags, and when to escalate under uncertainty.
- Start by acknowledging fear and confirming the location
- Use brief, structured questions in sequence
- Treat “I’m dying” as a red flag
- Escalate whenever your assessment isn’t certain
- Speak calmly—no irony, no judgment
- Close with a backup plan and a short recap
How does Empatyzer help prepare a safe emergency call?
Empatyzer helps you prepare an emergency conversation as a structure under pressure: a calm tone, short questions, active detection of risk signals and a clear escalation threshold.
Features that can help:
- Talk to Em about yourself: You can practice with Em your own question sequence and response to uncertainty, so that the emotional tone of the interlocutor does not obscure the assessment of important information.
- Micro-lessons: Reinforce the techniques of concise interviewing, paraphrasing, and escalation that need to be available from memory in high-stakes conversations.
What happened, and why it matters clinically
In 2017 in France, a young woman, Naomi Musenga, called for medical help, reporting severe pain and a sense that her life was in danger. The call was handled dismissively, and urgent assistance was not dispatched quickly enough. She died, sparking a national debate about the quality of telephone triage and how tone and empathy shape clinical decisions. Phone triage is a clinical tool: it triggers or delays lifesaving action, so its quality has direct consequences. The issue isn’t only protocols—it’s behaviors: how we listen, probe, and respond to uncertainty. When overload meets a culture of downplaying symptoms, even good scripts fall flat. The core lesson: an emergency call requires the same discipline and focus as a bedside exam.
The first 90 seconds: a structure that lowers risk
Open briefly, calmly, and with safety first: “I’m here to help. Please tell me where you are and what’s happening.” Then move into a question framework, such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) or ATMIST (Mechanism/Problem, Time, Injuries/Symptoms, Vital signs, Interventions so far, Other key data)—on the phone, use plain words and short sentences. Confirm location, a callback number, and whether the patient is alone, as this affects risk and logistics. Ask about onset, pain character, shortness of breath, dizziness, weakness, fever, bleeding, pregnancy, and red flags: “unbearable pain,” “I can’t breathe,” “I’m fainting,” “my arm/face is numb,” “I can’t speak,” “I feel like I’m dying.” Avoid discouraging comments and leading questions; keep momentum without cutting off key details. If a caller uses strong language, take it as clinical data, not “drama.” At the end of this phase, make a decision: if you’re not sure, escalate or dispatch.
Tone, operational empathy, and paraphrasing: small words, big impact
Tone of voice is a clinical intervention—it calms fear and improves data gathering. Use brief acknowledgments: “I hear you’re in a lot of pain and scared—I’m with you,” which stabilizes the call and builds cooperation. Paraphrase the essentials: “So the pain started suddenly, it’s getting worse, and you’re dizzy—that matters.” Avoid irony, jokes, and judgment, even if the report sounds unusual, as they degrade information quality and trust. Ask concrete questions without pressure: “I’ll ask a few short questions now to match the right help as fast as possible.” Narrate your actions: “I’m dispatching a team now—please stay on the line,” which reduces chaos. Close with a mini contingency plan: “If anything worsens—breathing, consciousness, heavy bleeding—tell me immediately.”
Escalation under uncertainty: thresholds that prevent error
Failing to escalate in the presence of red flags is a high-stakes decision, so escalation thresholds must be low, explicit, and practiced. Use the rule: “Better to send and stand down than not send and regret it,” especially when data are incomplete or communication is hard. Escalate immediately for severe dyspnea, loss of consciousness, stroke signs, massive bleeding, sudden severe abdominal pain in women of reproductive age or in pregnancy, and whenever a patient says “I feel like I’m dying.” If workload is heavy and doubt is growing, request a quick “second voice” while simultaneously initiating dispatch—consultation must not delay care. Document the key reasons for your decision to support case review and team learning. When the call fragments, use simple commands: “Breathe with me, slowly. I’m sending help now. Please answer yes or no.” After escalating, brief the caller on next steps to keep them engaged and ready.
Team culture, call audits, and metrics that truly help
Introduce short, regular call reviews: three calls a week, 20 minutes, focused on tone, completeness of questions, and the escalation decision. Track a few simple metrics: time from call start to dispatch, percent of calls with the full core question set, percent of red-flag calls that were escalated, and complaints about tone. Train micro-habits: a 10-second opening, a one-sentence key paraphrase, and a clear end-of-call safety plan. Protect rotation, micro-breaks, and support after difficult calls to reduce burnout and curb snarky tones. Post a simple desk poster: red flags, question order, supportive phrases, and quick-escalation numbers. Build a culture of “treat every call as potentially life-threatening until ruled out”—a decision anchor under time pressure. Leaders should model the behaviors, praise early escalation, and address cynicism as firmly as clinical errors.
Naomi Musenga’s case shows that an emergency call is a clinical tool, and tone, empathy, and a clear question structure can be life-critical. In the first minutes, focus on location, red flags, and escalation when uncertain. Simple acknowledgment and paraphrasing improve cooperation and data quality. Low escalation thresholds protect against the worst errors, especially with acute or ambiguous symptoms. Regular call audits and a handful of metrics help lock in good habits. A culture of “attentive listening + escalation under uncertainty” makes everyday work safer for teams and patients.
Empatyzer – support for phone triage and escalation under uncertainty
In daily dispatcher and ED work, Em—the Empatyzer assistant—helps craft short, effective openings and de‑escalation lines that work under time pressure. Teams can rehearse paraphrasing, emotional acknowledgment, and a neutral tone with Em in minutes, then tailor their own “go‑to lines” for tough moments. Em suggests simple question sequences and when to state an escalation decision clearly, without replacing clinical training or protocols. With personal diagnostics, users better understand their stress patterns and can adjust a tone that might otherwise sound detached or judgmental. At the team level, the organization sees only aggregated insights, making it easier to set shared conversation standards without rating individuals. Twice‑weekly micro‑lessons reinforce habits: a 10‑second opening, a key paraphrase, a clear safety plan, and escalation thresholds. Em also nudges a quick “post‑call” wrap‑up—two lines for documentation and a note on whether to seek a second voice for similar cases next time.
Sources and research
- Bensadon, A.-C., & Roger, J. (2018). Enquête sur les circonstances ayant conduit au décès d’une jeune patiente suite aux sollicitations du Samu de Strasbourg le 29 décembre 2017. Inspection générale des affaires sociales (IGAS). Source
- Sonis, J. D., Aaronson, E. L., Lee, R. Y., Philpotts, L. L., & White, B. A. (2018). Emergency Department Patient Experience: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Patient Experience, 5(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373517731359 DOI: 10.1177/2374373517731359
- Jesus, T. S., Zhang, M., Lee, D., Stern, B. Z., Struhar, J., Heinemann, A. W., Jordan, N., & Deutsch, A. (2025). Improving Patient Experience With Provider Communication: Systematic Review of Interventions, Implementation Strategies, and Their Effectiveness. Medical Care, 63(8), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002158 DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002158
- Jones, D., Dunn, L., Watt, I., & Macleod, U. (2019). Safety netting for primary care: evidence from a literature review. British Journal of General Practice, 69(678), e70–e79. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X700193 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X700193
Author: Empatyzer
Published:
Updated: