Elaine Bromiley (2005): Airway crisis and leadership
Elaine Bromiley (2005): airway crisis, leadership, and speaking up
TL;DR: A well-known OR case where technology didn’t fail—communication and leadership did. For clinical teams, it’s a practical playbook for speaking up under pressure, assigning roles, stopping fixation, and minimizing hypoxia. You’ll find short scripts, role splits, and timing prompts you can start using tomorrow.
- Name the situation and the single priority: oxygenation above all.
- Designate a leader, a timekeeper, and clear crisis roles.
- Stop fixation; switch strategy after two failed attempts.
- Use clear commands and close the communication loop.
- Use CUS and Two‑Challenge scripts when it’s unsafe.
- After events, learn through simulations and brief audits.
Key takeaway
Conflicts are part of working life, but they don’t have to damage relationships or your well-being. The AI coach helps separate facts from emotions and find a solution that works for everyone involved. That’s how interpersonal communication at work stops feeling like a minefield and becomes a path to agreement. You address issues early instead of letting them grow.
Watch the video on YouTubeWhat happened and why it matters now
During induction in the Elaine Bromiley case, the team entered a can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate scenario (CICO), and hypoxia time stretched because attention stayed locked on repeated intubation attempts. Equipment and technical skill were available; what was missing was explicit leadership, a clearly stated priority, and a decision to change course. This can happen in any OR. The universal lesson: call the situation early and set the target out loud—“Priority: oxygen.” In a crisis, language should be simple, loud, and unambiguous, heard by everyone in the room. The team needs one person to lead with short commands and assigned roles. Those behaviors cut unproductive time and protect brain oxygen.
Communication map: who saw what—and what no one heard
Reports noted that anesthetists, surgeons, and nurses held different mental models of the scene, and no one unified them into a shared picture. There were no loud, regular time and status call‑outs—no one saying, “We have a difficult airway, saturations are falling, we need to change strategy.” People lower in hierarchy raised concerns, but they weren’t clearly heard or didn’t trigger a decision. A practical rule: the leader states the problem, the priority, and the plan out loud; the team confirms with a brief echo. A simple formula is: “Situation: ineffective ventilation. Priority: oxygen. Plan: stop intubation attempts; switch to oxygenation.” Every command requires a confirmation: “Understood—stopping intubation; starting oxygenation now.” This “closed loop” aligns the team’s situational awareness and completes the task.
Breaking fixation: decide after two failed attempts
In this case, intubation attempts continued despite no improvement in oxygenation—classic single‑solution fixation. To counter it, adopt a standing rule: after two failed attempts, stop and change strategy. The leader gives a clear order: “Stop intubation attempts. Priority: oxygen. Move to an alternative airway now.” Assistants respond in their own words with what they’re doing next, making the plan change explicit. A CICO checklist helps not just as a sheet, but as a spoken, step‑by‑step briefing. If the change doesn’t work, the leader announces the next step and asks directly: “Who has a safer option right now?” That short question often unlocks memory search and reduces silent consent to keep doing what isn’t working.
Assertiveness under pressure: CUS and the Two‑Challenge rule
When risk escalates, “speaking up” needs structure, not just courage. The CUS model escalates language: “I’m Concerned…,” “I’m Uncomfortable…,” “This is Safety‑critical.” Example: “I’m concerned about the increasing time without effective ventilation. I’m uncomfortable that we haven’t changed plan. This is unsafe—requesting we stop attempts and oxygenate.” The Two‑Challenge rule is two clear statements of concern; if there’s no response, escalate to the leader: “Second challenge: this is unsafe. Please change the plan now.” After any such alert, the leader must respond and name the decision to close the loop (“Heard. We’re changing plan now.”). Short, memorable scripts fuel action when stress narrows attention and words are hard to find.
Structure in crisis: roles, commands, and time checks
Crises need instant structure: one person leads, another performs the primary task, a third assists, and a fourth tracks time and announces it. The leader assigns roles out loud: “I’m leading. Anna—airway. Michael—assist. Ola—timekeeping and loud call‑outs every 60 seconds.” Commands should be brief and phrased as directives, not questions; replies should include a paraphrase of the task. The timekeeper prompts the priority (“One minute—oxygenation is the priority; are we changing plan?”), which counters fixation. The scrub nurse can voice a mini‑checklist (“Item 1 done, item 2 ready”) to keep rhythm. This simple communication frame protects teams even when members don’t know each other or rotate between rooms.
Sustaining habits: simulations, debriefs, and metrics
Behaviors don’t maintain themselves—practice them like technical skills. Short crisis simulations with role play and commands should be routine, including for new staff. After an event, do a 10‑minute in‑room debrief: what worked, what delayed decisions, which messages were unclear. Communication metrics track progress: time from recognizing failed ventilation to announcing a plan change, number of explicit time call‑outs, percentage of closed loops. Psychological safety surveys matter too; without that, CUS and Two‑Challenge won’t stick. Every incident or near miss should be reviewed through a human‑factors lens, with lessons fed back into the next simulation. That’s how procedure becomes lived behavior—not a poster on the wall.
The Elaine Bromiley case showed that in a crisis, words, roles, and decisions matter as much as equipment. Naming the situation and the priority organizes action and shortens hypoxia. A clear leader and time checks limit single‑solution fixation. CUS and Two‑Challenge give everyone both the right and the duty to voice risk. Regular simulations and simple metrics turn these behaviors into team habits.
Empatyzer for training speaking up and leading airway crises
In everyday department work, Empatyzer’s AI assistant “Em” helps craft short, clear commands, time call‑outs, and CUS/Two‑Challenge scripts tailored to your team’s style. Before a sim or a shift, you can rehearse, in minutes, saying the priority out loud and interrupting fixation (“Stop attempts — priority oxygen — we’re changing plan”). Empatyzer adapts suggestions to user habits and departmental context, making it easier to choose words that feel natural—without replacing clinical training. It also helps teams agree on simple operating norms: who leads, who keeps time, and what the standard commands are, then turns them into quick reference cards for the OR. At the org level, only aggregated results are visible, supporting a common language without singling anyone out or using it for performance reviews. Twice‑weekly micro‑lessons reinforce habits like “name the priority in the first 10 seconds” and “close the loop in your own words.” Em also offers concise debrief prompts so lessons feed back into practice instead of disappearing in notes. In real‑world pressure, that helps teams pivot to oxygenation faster and hear voices from outside the hierarchy.
Author: Empatyzer
Published:
Updated: