CHRO/HRD asks: Who can be chosen for conversations in Empatyzer?

TL;DR:

  • Conversations about a specific person are possible only if they agree to be on the list.
  • No consent means their profile is hidden and they can't be chosen for dyads.
  • Anyone can ask Empatyzer for tips about working with others; one person's privacy doesn't block use.

Empatyzer only allows conversations and preparation for talks about people who have consented to appear on the company list. Consent is the sole condition that makes someone's profile selectable for analysis or role-play; if a person opts out, their profile is not visible or available for selection, protecting privacy and preventing unwanted exposure. At the same time, any user can ask Empatyzer for guidance on collaborating with colleagues without needing those colleagues' prior consent, because the tool focuses on relationship strategies and communication advice rather than exposing raw diagnostic data. The system is designed with privacy as a priority: no raw individual results are shared, team-level summaries and anonymization are used where needed. Consent for comparisons enables additional comparative recommendations, but its absence does not block access to chat features and micro-lessons. Users can delete or deactivate their accounts at any time, triggering data removal under the retention policy. For HR and managers the rule is clear: no access to raw personal data without consent; Empatyzer adds value through interpretation and support, not evaluation. This voluntary, low-administration approach helps scale adoption while respecting individual privacy and reducing fear of surveillance.

Consent to be on the list is key: without it a person cannot be selected for conversations, but lack of consent does not prevent using Empatyzer or getting advice about relationships; privacy is preserved while the tool stays useful.

Author: Empatyzer

Published:

Updated: