CHRO/HRD asks: What does 'company sees only aggregated data' mean in Empatyzer?

In practical terms, Empatyzer provides the company with summaries and trends rather than individual employee profiles. The organization receives aggregated indicators of culture and team dynamics, such as distributions of motivators and work styles, completion rates for micro-lessons and activity timing. It also gets usage metrics—number of active users, login frequency and topics reported—presented at group level. An organizational overview shows reporting lines and aggregated signals of tension between units. Raw individual results and the contents of Em chat remain private to the user and are never shared. What is visible depends on privacy rules and settings, and the system enforces a minimum group-size threshold to preserve anonymity. This way HR and managers can spot directions for action and potential risks without identifying specific people. Collective reports are meant for planning interventions, monitoring outcomes and tracking trends, not for evaluating employees. For example, a department-level rise in frustration or drop in engagement can be detected, but the source individuals are not revealed. Users keep control of their privacy settings and can delete their account, which removes them from aggregates. The design balances organizational usefulness with employee privacy, giving HR signals to act on while blocking avenues for surveillance and misuse.

Company view is limited to anonymous, aggregated metrics and overviews; raw individual scores and chat content remain private, and anonymity is enforced by minimum group-size rules.